www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

Creighton: 2012-2013

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Doug McDermott

520

0.671

38%

72%

64%

31%

39%

53%

30%

49%

96%

0.42

88%

Austin Chatman

234

0.504

21%

36%

6%

44%

36%

16%

35%

43%

91%

0.28

80%

Grant Gibbs

213

0.612

36%

74%

21%

39%

42%

17%

25%

40%

81%

0.37

76%

Gregory Echenique

209

0.664

73%

76%

76%

27%

40%

57%

0%

---

---

0.54

65%

Ethan Wragge

187

0.682

4%

75%

83%

2%

0%

---

94%

45%

100%

0.17

94%

Jahenns Manigat

180

0.550

18%

70%

30%

10%

22%

50%

72%

36%

98%

0.15

74%

Avery Dingman

111

0.582

10%

73%

25%

14%

27%

75%

77%

40%

97%

0.14

75%

Will Artino

80

0.632

68%

76%

59%

32%

42%

55%

0%

---

---

0.54

53%

Josh Jones

50

0.525

16%

50%

0%

24%

50%

33%

60%

33%

90%

0.14

86%

Nevin Johnson

41

0.535

17%

71%

80%

37%

47%

29%

46%

32%

83%

0.39

62%

Andre Yates

40

0.309

38%

33%

40%

40%

31%

20%

22%

0%

---

0.45

56%

Geoffrey Groselle

7

0.506

86%

67%

100%

14%

0%

---

0%

---

---

0.57

25%

Alex Olsen

7

0.678

43%

67%

100%

43%

100%

67%

14%

0%

---

1.00

57%

Taylor Stormberg

3

0.833

33%

100%

0%

0%

---

---

67%

50%

100%

0.00

---

Mogboluwaga Oginni

2

1.000

50%

100%

100%

50%

100%

0%

0%

---

---

0.00

---

Joe Kelling

2

0.584

0%

---

---

100%

100%

50%

0%

---

---

1.50

0%

TEAM

1886

0.612

33%

69%

56%

27%

39%

39%

39%

42%

95%

0.34

76%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

25%

64%

7%

69%

2pt Jumpers

42%

34%

6%

37%

3pt Shots

33%

31%

0%

31%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

14%

60%

23%

70%

20%

44%

57%

41%

Rebound, 11-35 s

28%

60%

30%

70%

33%

38%

38%

46%

Opp score, 0-10 s

6%

55%

36%

65%

17%

33%

47%

37%

Opp score, 11-35 s

35%

56%

31%

74%

30%

36%

39%

38%

Steal, 0-10 s

5%

68%

55%

62%

10%

71%

35%

52%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

56%

31%

53%

29%

50%

40%

42%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

1%

61%

32%

67%

5%

0%

63%

42%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

8%

61%

34%

74%

34%

31%

33%

53%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against CREIGHTON.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

11%

43%

29%

63%

30%

29%

41%

26%

Rebound, 11-35 s

19%

47%

21%

62%

45%

38%

34%

32%

Opp score, 0-10 s

5%

54%

22%

95%

33%

38%

45%

31%

Opp score, 11-35 s

45%

44%

20%

58%

46%

34%

35%

32%

Steal, 0-10 s

7%

57%

52%

72%

19%

24%

28%

35%

Steal, 11-35 s

4%

28%

14%

50%

57%

24%

29%

18%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

3%

40%

31%

53%

38%

44%

31%

13%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

6%

44%

19%

58%

50%

33%

31%

35%

Updated 2013-04-09