www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

Creighton: 2011-2012

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Doug McDermott

433

0.682

48%

74%

67%

31%

47%

56%

21%

47%

98%

0.33

83%

Antoine Young

289

0.518

31%

57%

4%

58%

39%

20%

10%

33%

60%

0.53

72%

Gregory Echenique

184

0.624

75%

70%

65%

25%

33%

73%

0%

---

---

0.58

66%

Ethan Wragge

153

0.605

7%

64%

43%

1%

50%

100%

92%

39%

100%

0.11

82%

Grant Gibbs

141

0.574

36%

63%

28%

34%

44%

29%

30%

36%

93%

0.56

68%

Jahenns Manigat

131

0.612

13%

41%

57%

8%

36%

0%

79%

43%

98%

0.19

84%

Josh Jones

112

0.542

12%

57%

38%

19%

19%

25%

69%

42%

94%

0.29

56%

Avery Dingman

61

0.596

10%

50%

33%

8%

40%

0%

82%

40%

95%

0.18

82%

Austin Chatman

61

0.430

33%

50%

10%

48%

21%

17%

20%

42%

80%

0.34

67%

Will Artino

55

0.623

60%

76%

72%

40%

36%

62%

0%

---

---

0.29

75%

Ross Ferrarini

9

0.278

22%

50%

0%

0%

---

---

78%

14%

0%

0.00

---

Taylor Stormberg

8

0.312

12%

0%

---

12%

100%

0%

75%

17%

100%

0.00

---

Matthew Dorwart

8

0.371

12%

0%

---

12%

0%

---

75%

33%

100%

0.38

33%

Derek Sebastian

3

0.633

33%

100%

100%

67%

50%

0%

0%

---

---

0.67

50%

Nevin Johnson

1

0.000

100%

0%

---

0%

---

---

0%

---

---

0.00

---

TEAM

1649

0.594

36%

67%

52%

30%

39%

38%

34%

40%

95%

0.37

73%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

25%

64%

7%

69%

2pt Jumpers

44%

37%

5%

39%

3pt Shots

32%

34%

1%

35%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

18%

60%

34%

73%

27%

40%

39%

41%

Rebound, 11-35 s

22%

56%

34%

63%

27%

38%

39%

41%

Opp score, 0-10 s

6%

50%

28%

65%

27%

27%

44%

36%

Opp score, 11-35 s

39%

54%

32%

69%

34%

33%

34%

40%

Steal, 0-10 s

4%

74%

55%

69%

17%

62%

28%

62%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

55%

32%

67%

41%

33%

27%

50%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

3%

64%

27%

78%

21%

29%

52%

47%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

6%

62%

34%

75%

32%

48%

34%

42%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against CREIGHTON.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

14%

59%

28%

80%

33%

41%

39%

41%

Rebound, 11-35 s

17%

46%

24%

69%

48%

37%

28%

29%

Opp score, 0-10 s

8%

56%

24%

58%

35%

51%

41%

39%

Opp score, 11-35 s

43%

45%

18%

58%

50%

35%

32%

35%

Steal, 0-10 s

7%

62%

45%

71%

28%

39%

26%

46%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

37%

24%

50%

41%

24%

34%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

3%

49%

11%

50%

34%

50%

54%

32%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

6%

50%

32%

57%

45%

44%

23%

35%

Updated 2012-10-26