www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

Quinnipiac: 2011-2012

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

James Johnson

304

0.461

22%

36%

17%

38%

33%

37%

40%

36%

68%

0.27

74%

Ike Azotam

256

0.559

80%

57%

57%

20%

46%

38%

0%

---

---

0.38

57%

Dave Johnson

156

0.438

30%

28%

15%

46%

34%

29%

24%

37%

93%

0.42

73%

Zaid Hearst

143

0.489

29%

48%

25%

42%

43%

31%

29%

32%

85%

0.26

70%

Garvey Young

107

0.528

48%

53%

33%

22%

42%

30%

30%

34%

91%

0.36

66%

Ousmane Drame

105

0.491

87%

48%

48%

13%

36%

20%

0%

---

---

0.57

55%

Jamee Jackson

76

0.483

79%

53%

50%

21%

38%

50%

0%

---

---

0.45

38%

Evan Conti

37

0.457

27%

50%

0%

41%

40%

17%

32%

33%

75%

0.14

40%

Nate Gause

37

0.240

30%

36%

100%

22%

25%

50%

49%

11%

100%

0.03

0%

Justin Harris

23

0.448

48%

55%

67%

52%

25%

33%

0%

---

---

0.35

75%

Alex Jackson

19

0.312

74%

29%

75%

21%

0%

---

5%

0%

---

0.74

57%

Marquis Barnett

9

0.667

78%

57%

50%

22%

100%

100%

0%

---

---

0.00

---

Kevin Tarca

4

0.000

0%

---

---

0%

---

---

100%

0%

---

0.50

0%

Terrance Bobb-Jones

4

0.500

25%

100%

0%

75%

33%

100%

0%

---

---

0.00

---

T'ziah Wood-Smith

2

0.000

50%

0%

---

50%

0%

---

0%

---

---

0.00

---

TEAM

1282

0.481

48%

49%

46%

31%

37%

35%

21%

33%

78%

0.35

62%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

44%

51%

11%

57%

2pt Jumpers

26%

32%

4%

33%

3pt Shots

30%

32%

1%

32%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

15%

46%

49%

46%

26%

31%

25%

41%

Rebound, 11-35 s

24%

48%

44%

51%

37%

43%

19%

34%

Opp score, 0-10 s

7%

51%

36%

71%

24%

43%

41%

25%

Opp score, 11-35 s

38%

42%

38%

46%

36%

36%

26%

30%

Steal, 0-10 s

6%

48%

74%

52%

19%

20%

7%

50%

Steal, 11-35 s

2%

43%

41%

56%

50%

27%

9%

50%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

1%

78%

33%

67%

44%

50%

22%

100%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

7%

41%

32%

32%

48%

28%

20%

58%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against QUINNIPIAC.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

14%

53%

48%

58%

14%

33%

38%

36%

Rebound, 11-35 s

19%

39%

43%

49%

34%

27%

24%

27%

Opp score, 0-10 s

7%

43%

44%

52%

5%

0%

51%

26%

Opp score, 11-35 s

42%

42%

34%

45%

35%

31%

31%

33%

Steal, 0-10 s

6%

66%

74%

70%

3%

100%

22%

31%

Steal, 11-35 s

3%

48%

36%

67%

28%

43%

36%

22%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

50%

38%

67%

12%

50%

50%

25%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

6%

41%

46%

31%

19%

45%

35%

35%

Updated 2012-10-26