Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andre Hollins |
351 |
0.582 |
14% |
66% |
33% |
33% |
32% |
19% |
53% |
42% |
68% |
0.38 |
81% |
Austin Hollins |
291 |
0.547 |
24% |
71% |
39% |
23% |
27% |
83% |
53% |
34% |
92% |
0.31 |
80% |
Rodney Williams |
264 |
0.523 |
47% |
72% |
66% |
38% |
29% |
52% |
16% |
22% |
89% |
0.43 |
63% |
Joe Coleman |
247 |
0.526 |
40% |
74% |
70% |
50% |
31% |
53% |
11% |
31% |
100% |
0.30 |
69% |
Trevor Mbakwe |
205 |
0.582 |
63% |
64% |
55% |
37% |
43% |
56% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
0.75 |
61% |
Julian Welch |
93 |
0.434 |
24% |
45% |
40% |
35% |
36% |
75% |
41% |
29% |
100% |
0.32 |
53% |
Maverick Ahanmisi |
75 |
0.593 |
9% |
71% |
40% |
28% |
33% |
14% |
63% |
40% |
95% |
0.43 |
81% |
Oto Osenieks |
74 |
0.397 |
23% |
71% |
83% |
42% |
26% |
25% |
35% |
8% |
100% |
0.41 |
80% |
Elliott Eliason |
57 |
0.504 |
42% |
75% |
72% |
56% |
28% |
89% |
2% |
0% |
--- |
0.35 |
65% |
Maurice Walker |
55 |
0.471 |
69% |
53% |
60% |
31% |
18% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.62 |
62% |
Andre Ingram |
43 |
0.466 |
49% |
62% |
54% |
51% |
27% |
83% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.63 |
52% |
Wally Ellenson |
26 |
0.328 |
38% |
60% |
50% |
23% |
17% |
0% |
38% |
10% |
100% |
0.12 |
33% |
Kendal Shell |
5 |
0.600 |
40% |
100% |
50% |
60% |
33% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Chris Halvorsen |
2 |
0.678 |
50% |
100% |
100% |
50% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
1.00 |
0% |
TEAM |
1788 |
0.534 |
34% |
68% |
58% |
36% |
31% |
52% |
30% |
34% |
83% |
0.42 |
69% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
28% |
60% |
12% |
68% |
2pt Jumpers |
37% |
31% |
16% |
36% |
3pt Shots |
35% |
34% |
2% |
34% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
15% |
64% |
40% |
82% |
26% |
38% |
34% |
42% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
22% |
45% |
29% |
66% |
44% |
30% |
27% |
32% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
6% |
56% |
32% |
76% |
26% |
25% |
42% |
39% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
35% |
45% |
26% |
60% |
40% |
35% |
34% |
29% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
8% |
60% |
70% |
75% |
17% |
12% |
14% |
29% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
4% |
47% |
24% |
77% |
40% |
32% |
36% |
30% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
67% |
15% |
100% |
37% |
50% |
48% |
46% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
7% |
62% |
25% |
71% |
34% |
52% |
41% |
43% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against MINNESOTA.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
10% |
53% |
25% |
82% |
29% |
26% |
46% |
36% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
18% |
47% |
24% |
58% |
38% |
27% |
38% |
40% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
6% |
39% |
25% |
70% |
34% |
26% |
41% |
21% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
42% |
41% |
22% |
56% |
42% |
31% |
36% |
29% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
10% |
60% |
50% |
71% |
22% |
48% |
28% |
32% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
3% |
52% |
17% |
57% |
40% |
35% |
43% |
44% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
38% |
41% |
62% |
19% |
17% |
41% |
15% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
8% |
43% |
23% |
54% |
41% |
28% |
37% |
36% |
Updated 2013-04-09