Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gary Talton |
222 |
0.519 |
30% |
49% |
9% |
38% |
40% |
9% |
32% |
30% |
67% |
0.40 |
88% |
Daniel Barnes |
196 |
0.538 |
17% |
50% |
29% |
19% |
39% |
53% |
63% |
37% |
96% |
0.24 |
70% |
Hayden Humes |
188 |
0.577 |
39% |
72% |
68% |
20% |
21% |
50% |
40% |
39% |
100% |
0.12 |
77% |
Josh Crittle |
163 |
0.507 |
36% |
63% |
43% |
62% |
33% |
39% |
2% |
0% |
--- |
0.57 |
75% |
Marc Brown |
96 |
0.488 |
33% |
50% |
50% |
31% |
30% |
44% |
35% |
26% |
100% |
0.46 |
84% |
Joey Miller |
79 |
0.426 |
30% |
42% |
20% |
27% |
19% |
50% |
43% |
29% |
100% |
0.37 |
72% |
Will Simonton |
49 |
0.393 |
45% |
50% |
64% |
53% |
27% |
86% |
2% |
0% |
--- |
0.24 |
58% |
Anthony Kelley |
46 |
0.541 |
41% |
58% |
73% |
11% |
40% |
0% |
48% |
32% |
100% |
0.30 |
71% |
Jay Parker |
35 |
0.418 |
37% |
23% |
33% |
17% |
33% |
100% |
46% |
25% |
75% |
0.49 |
82% |
Jake Wiegand |
26 |
0.558 |
62% |
62% |
60% |
23% |
33% |
0% |
15% |
25% |
100% |
0.58 |
67% |
Ahman Fells |
18 |
0.352 |
33% |
67% |
100% |
39% |
14% |
100% |
28% |
20% |
100% |
0.22 |
25% |
Gabe Snider |
17 |
0.401 |
18% |
33% |
100% |
12% |
50% |
0% |
71% |
25% |
67% |
0.06 |
100% |
Ngijol Songolo |
5 |
0.300 |
20% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
80% |
25% |
100% |
0.00 |
--- |
TEAM |
1140 |
0.508 |
32% |
56% |
47% |
32% |
32% |
36% |
36% |
33% |
92% |
0.34 |
77% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
35% |
57% |
10% |
63% |
2pt Jumpers |
30% |
36% |
3% |
37% |
3pt Shots |
35% |
35% |
1% |
35% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
12% |
60% |
33% |
47% |
24% |
58% |
43% |
48% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
25% |
42% |
25% |
66% |
40% |
27% |
35% |
28% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
5% |
61% |
38% |
76% |
20% |
78% |
42% |
26% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
37% |
43% |
27% |
51% |
35% |
29% |
39% |
32% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
8% |
54% |
62% |
72% |
16% |
18% |
22% |
20% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
3% |
19% |
35% |
56% |
35% |
0% |
31% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
36% |
43% |
67% |
29% |
25% |
29% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
9% |
48% |
31% |
48% |
31% |
30% |
39% |
41% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against ILLINOIS-CHICAGO.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
14% |
50% |
39% |
53% |
21% |
28% |
40% |
39% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
24% |
41% |
25% |
56% |
38% |
27% |
37% |
31% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
5% |
51% |
44% |
60% |
11% |
40% |
44% |
30% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
38% |
49% |
28% |
56% |
34% |
40% |
37% |
35% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
7% |
67% |
67% |
78% |
11% |
43% |
21% |
31% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
50% |
47% |
25% |
24% |
50% |
29% |
60% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
1% |
55% |
27% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
73% |
25% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
9% |
49% |
20% |
53% |
43% |
39% |
37% |
39% |
Updated 2013-04-09