www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

Dayton: 2010-2011

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Chris Wright

277

0.477

44%

60%

49%

49%

31%

60%

7%

26%

80%

0.52

59%

Chris Johnson

249

0.540

16%

59%

61%

26%

27%

65%

59%

38%

78%

0.29

85%

Juwan Staten

223

0.425

39%

53%

9%

52%

34%

25%

9%

5%

0%

0.34

59%

Paul Williams

186

0.543

17%

42%

23%

27%

38%

47%

56%

39%

73%

0.28

81%

Josh Parker

160

0.507

12%

47%

11%

16%

31%

12%

72%

34%

49%

0.28

73%

Josh Benson

108

0.561

52%

75%

38%

48%

29%

67%

0%

---

---

0.40

70%

Devin Searcy

88

0.546

47%

73%

53%

53%

32%

60%

0%

---

---

0.22

84%

Luke Fabrizius

79

0.516

8%

83%

40%

19%

27%

25%

73%

36%

86%

0.09

57%

Brandon Spearman

69

0.450

23%

38%

50%

36%

20%

40%

41%

43%

75%

0.41

57%

Devin Oliver

42

0.346

38%

50%

50%

33%

14%

50%

29%

25%

100%

0.14

33%

Matt Kavanaugh

34

0.500

79%

56%

40%

21%

14%

0%

0%

---

---

0.62

57%

Ralph Hill

8

0.688

12%

100%

100%

12%

0%

---

75%

50%

100%

0.00

---

Peter Zestermann

6

0.000

0%

---

---

100%

0%

---

0%

---

---

0.33

0%

Logan Nourse

2

0.000

0%

---

---

0%

---

---

100%

0%

---

0.00

---

Brian Vonderhaar

1

1.000

100%

100%

0%

0%

---

---

0%

---

---

0.00

---

TEAM

1532

0.497

30%

59%

39%

37%

30%

47%

33%

35%

72%

0.34

67%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

29%

62%

11%

70%

2pt Jumpers

33%

32%

8%

35%

3pt Shots

38%

33%

1%

33%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

17%

50%

37%

66%

29%

34%

34%

31%

Rebound, 11-35 s

21%

44%

23%

48%

43%

33%

34%

37%

Opp score, 0-10 s

9%

54%

29%

68%

24%

38%

47%

36%

Opp score, 11-35 s

33%

42%

24%

54%

41%

25%

35%

35%

Steal, 0-10 s

5%

65%

61%

68%

19%

33%

19%

58%

Steal, 11-35 s

2%

35%

26%

33%

43%

30%

30%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

4%

52%

31%

85%

31%

15%

38%

38%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

9%

43%

23%

68%

50%

31%

26%

29%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against DAYTON.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

12%

54%

35%

66%

18%

21%

47%

39%

Rebound, 11-35 s

23%

44%

22%

63%

36%

28%

42%

31%

Opp score, 0-10 s

5%

41%

32%

53%

19%

50%

49%

19%

Opp score, 11-35 s

41%

46%

23%

68%

39%

36%

38%

29%

Steal, 0-10 s

5%

74%

71%

76%

14%

50%

15%

56%

Steal, 11-35 s

2%

57%

19%

50%

48%

40%

33%

57%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

3%

42%

39%

50%

16%

20%

45%

29%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

10%

49%

22%

56%

35%

22%

43%

45%

Updated 2012-10-26