Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tristan Greenidge |
19 |
0.431 |
42% |
25% |
50% |
11% |
50% |
0% |
47% |
33% |
67% |
0.21 |
75% |
Miguel Martinez |
17 |
0.277 |
35% |
50% |
100% |
65% |
9% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.35 |
50% |
Tyreek Luckett |
17 |
0.423 |
6% |
100% |
0% |
12% |
0% |
--- |
82% |
29% |
100% |
0.24 |
50% |
Ryan Spady |
13 |
0.535 |
38% |
40% |
50% |
46% |
33% |
0% |
15% |
50% |
100% |
0.92 |
75% |
James Thorn |
10 |
0.150 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
20% |
0% |
--- |
80% |
12% |
0% |
0.00 |
--- |
Jake Patterson |
8 |
0.337 |
50% |
50% |
50% |
12% |
0% |
--- |
38% |
0% |
--- |
0.62 |
60% |
Josh Hough |
6 |
0.000 |
33% |
0% |
--- |
67% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Lawrence Hofmann |
5 |
0.000 |
20% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
80% |
0% |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Chad Torkelsen |
5 |
0.000 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
40% |
0% |
--- |
60% |
0% |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
John Heinrich |
4 |
0.223 |
75% |
33% |
0% |
25% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.25 |
0% |
Jordan Collins |
3 |
1.000 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
67% |
100% |
0.00 |
--- |
Alexander Marshall |
3 |
0.000 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
0% |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Clark Woodworth |
2 |
0.750 |
50% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
50% |
100% |
100% |
0.00 |
--- |
TEAM |
112 |
0.338 |
28% |
35% |
55% |
28% |
13% |
25% |
45% |
24% |
83% |
0.29 |
62% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
35% |
77% |
0% |
77% |
2pt Jumpers |
26% |
56% |
6% |
60% |
3pt Shots |
39% |
42% |
0% |
42% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
7% |
25% |
0% |
--- |
17% |
0% |
83% |
20% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
19% |
9% |
6% |
0% |
12% |
0% |
81% |
8% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
5% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
52% |
38% |
36% |
44% |
32% |
14% |
32% |
36% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
2% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
50% |
0% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
50% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
4% |
50% |
67% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
33% |
100% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
9% |
12% |
25% |
50% |
38% |
0% |
38% |
0% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
21% |
50% |
29% |
100% |
14% |
0% |
57% |
25% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
28% |
54% |
37% |
90% |
30% |
50% |
33% |
11% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
2% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
30% |
74% |
28% |
50% |
7% |
50% |
66% |
58% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
10% |
75% |
50% |
80% |
30% |
67% |
20% |
50% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
100% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
1% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
100% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
6% |
67% |
17% |
0% |
83% |
80% |
0% |
--- |
Updated 2013-04-09